EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Between 1999 and 2017, roughly 600,000 Americans died what economists call “deaths of despair,” a category that includes suicide, drug overdose, and alcoholic liver disease concentrated among working-class adults without college degrees. Over the same period, American worker productivity rose 65 percent while typical worker compensation rose only 15 percent, according to Economic Policy Institute analysis. The difference did not disappear. It moved upward. The system rewards wealth over work: those who grow assets pay less than those who earn paychecks. CEO-to-worker pay expanded from 21-to-1 in 1965 to 281-to-1 in 2024. The wealthiest 400 American families now pay a lower effective tax rate than the working class. This is not drift. It is design.

This paper documents the extraction machine: a system through which concentrated wealth, specifically billionaires and corporations with sufficient scale, captures the rule-making authority of democratic governance. The machinery operates through five interlocking components: rule-writing capture (who writes tax codes, regulations, and legislation), rule-interpretation capture (who shapes judicial doctrine through appointments and legal infrastructure), rule-enforcement capture (who faces consequences and who does not), narrative capture (what ideas are considered reasonable or possible), and the compounding loop (how each cycle of wealth funding influence funding rules funding more wealth accelerates the system). These components reinforce each other, explaining why single-issue reforms fail and why the system persists across electoral cycles. This framework is an analytical model. It documents mechanisms and presents data, not ideological prescriptions.

The extraction machine serves a narrow group: billionaires and corporations with sufficient scale to capture rule-making authority. In practical terms: unless you are a large corporation, or your wealth grows by a million dollars an hour, this system does not serve you. High earners, including physicians, engineers, and successful professionals, along with small business owners, pay substantial effective tax rates, face the same inflated costs for healthcare and education, and cannot access the mechanisms that write the rules. They are often the rhetorical cover for policies that benefit those who can.

The evidence is visible across essential domains. In healthcare, the United States spends 18 percent of GDP, far more than peer nations, while delivering worse outcomes and leaving millions uninsured. In education, elite institutions overwhelmingly serve the already wealthy while working-class students shoulder unsustainable debt. In housing, the 2008 financial crisis destroyed $11 trillion in household wealth while banks received bailouts and investors purchased foreclosed homes at discount. In each domain, the pattern repeats: rules written to enable extraction, costs socialized while profits privatized, public capacity eroded.

The stakes extend beyond economics. When governments lose the fiscal and political capacity to deliver material security, democratic legitimacy erodes. The life expectancy gap between Americans with and without college degrees has widened from 2.5 years in 1992 to 8.5 years today, a stratification approaching caste formation. Populations that cannot rely on democratic institutions to meet basic needs become susceptible to authoritarian promises. This pattern is visible globally. The United States is not immune.

Traditional reform efforts fail because they assume institutions are neutral arbiters that need convincing through better arguments or stronger mobilization. The institutions are not neutral. They have been captured. Research analyzing nearly 1,800 policy issues found that average citizen preferences have “near-zero” impact on policy when economic elites prefer different outcomes. Eighty percent of Americans support overturning Citizens United, which would end what amounts to legal bribery. The system blocks what 80 percent want. This is not democracy failing. It is democracy operating under conditions of systematic capture.

An adequate response requires structural intervention, not symptomatic relief. It must function under degraded institutional conditions, operate without elite permission, and be designed for resilience across decades. This means building infrastructure that existing reform efforts lack: synthesis capacity to integrate fragmented expertise, narrative reach beyond progressive echo chambers, sustained funding for long-term strategy, coordination across organizations, and civic education at scale. The Heritage Foundation built such infrastructure over forty years and reshaped American political economy. An equivalent commitment to democratic restoration is both necessary and achievable.

The current system is the radical departure. It is radical to allow billionaires and large corporations to pay lower effective rates than nurses. It is radical to treat healthcare as privilege when peer nations guarantee it as right. Americans already agree on majority-aligned outcomes: healthcare as right, education as opportunity, climate resilience, modern infrastructure, tax fairness. What is missing is not public will. It is a system capable of translating that will into policy when concentrated wealth opposes it. When that system exists, the policy changes Americans already support become politically achievable. Building that system is the work this paper addresses.

‍